Tips for Teaching Student Writing
Tips for Teaching Student Writing
Effective writing instruction plays a vital role in student learning across all disciplines.
Written by writing educators Jane Kokernak and Lowry Pei, this collection of practical,
classroom-tested strategies offers faculty simple ways to improve student writing,
encourage critical thinking, and enhance engagement with course content. From designing
clearer assignments to providing meaningful feedback, these approaches help create
a supportive environment where students can develop stronger communication skills
and become more confident writers.
This resource also highlights key areas to consider when responding to student work
and provides guidance for using writing as a powerful tool for learning in any discipline.
Eleven Things You Could Start Doing Today for the Benefit of Your Students' Writing
by Jane Kokernak, M.A., Writing Center Supervisor, Mount Ida College
and Lowry Pei, Ph.D., Professor of English, Simmons College
The spread of the writing process and writing across the curriculum movements means
that today's faculty who teach or use writing in their courses understand that it
is both a process and discipline-based. Still, our experience with colleagues tells
us that teachers continue to look for new strategies to engage student writers and
boost their own teaching effectiveness. We've put together a list of practices that
are doable and "no-tech," yet each has the potential to transform the ways you assign,
discuss, and comment on student work.
- Give writing assignments in written form, not just word of mouth.
Your student will be able to carry away your actual words about the assignment, not
just a vague memory of them, and when she wonders at 1 a.m. what she's really supposed
to do, she'll refer to your handout. For many students, puzzling over an assignment
sheet becomes the first step in doing the writing. And for you, the act of writing
down the assignment will help clarify its connection to your course goals.
- During classroom discussions of student writing, hand out copies of the writing being
discussed.
You want students to talk about both what has been said in the writing, and how. Both
require students to discuss the written text, not their personal recall of hearing
it read aloud by the writer. It is impossible to have a discussion of writing at
the sentence level, where much of the crucial action takes place, without having the
written text to refer to. Also, the presence of the physical text reminds students
that you're asking them to work with the writing, not work on the student who wrote
it.
- Insist on a classroom with seminar-style seating or moveable desks, so that teacher
and students can face each other in discussions.
By giving feedback to another writer, guided by a more experienced writer (the teacher),
students learn to recognize and talk helpfully about a text's various qualities. Over
time, students gradually internalize these discussions; they learn how to put into
words their own use of written language. It is this that will leave them with a greater
feeling of control over their future writing.
- Get your students to write weekly in some form, whether it's a draft, informal response,
or free write.
Habits are powerful things, and the ability to generate written text at will is crucial.
Weekly practice in small doses flexes a student's writing muscles regularly and gives
her more material (e.g., her own concerns about the course material) when it comes
time to draft an essay. As Courtney, a first-year writing student, once remarked,
"By having us write short assignments every week, it made the research paper less
scary when it came time to do it."
- In class, write when your students are writing.
You are what you teach. If you want your students to write, be a writer in a way
visible to them. Embody the writing way of life. If, for example, you ask students
during a charged dialogue to pause and reflect in writing for 10 minutes, your joining
them displays a commitment to writing as a way to struggle deeply with hard questions.
- Only grade finished products, not drafts or informal writing.
Drafts and informal writing are, by definition, not completed work. The whole point
of assigning them is to move students away from trying to write the finished product
on the first try. The act of grading a draft, response paper, or journal entry sends
a contradictory message by implying that it can be judged by standards applicable
to completed work. The power of making room in the course for process will be lost
if students believe that their "draft" should look finished.
- Give students' writing back within 1 week. Adjust level of feedback to time available.
Work returned soon with a little feedback, from the teacher or from a structured peer
review, beats work returned later with a lot of feedback. A teacher's few sentences
penciled on a student's informal response paper or another student's questions jotted
on his classmate's draft will prompt more thinking and writing. Timing matters: The
student needs to feel he is in a live exchange of ideas.
- The first time you read a batch of student work, do so without a pencil in hand. Just
read to get a sense of it; make no comments. Second time, read closely and make comments.
This method makes use of the power of your mind to process what you've read in its
own quiet way. If you read the first time simply as a reader, not as a commentator
or editor, then let the reading sink in, you can arrive at a basic idea of what your
student is up to with surprisingly little effort. By the time you return to the stack,
your brain will have invisibly processed, for example, that one student has sorted
out the chronology of her ideas while most of the class still grapples with ordering
their paragraphs. (Skeptical? Try this once; it works.)
- On each piece of writing you respond to, make at least 1 mark per page. Easiest technique
is to underline what's promising, worth pursuing, well said.
This is the basic practical way of creating a feeling of ongoing dialogue between
writer and reader. Never underestimate the power of a student's knowing that you
are paying attention to him. Underlining promising things is quick and communicative;
it becomes a way of cultivating your own perception of the student's potential, as
well as guiding and encouraging the student to become aware of it. And don't forget
to tell your students what the underlines, and your other marks, mean.
- Retire the red pen; stop copy-editing your students' work. Point out no more than
2 patterns of error, and leave it to the student to find a way to resolve the errors.
When you copy-edit a student's work, many students will look at the marked-up copy
and think "Oh, that's been taken care of for me." Rather than encouraging learning,
it sends the message that correcting those things is the teacher's job. If a student
can see that she regularly makes errors of a certain type, based on a misunderstanding
of the underlying principle, and then correct that misunderstanding, lasting learning
could take place.
- Commenting on the first draft of a full-fledged paper is your best opportunity to
bring about learning. On the draft, make no more than 3 major suggestions.
Only the strongest students - who are likely to be the best writers already - will
read the commentary on a graded paper, extract general principles from the comments,
and carry them over to their next writing assignment. The others will simply zero
in on the grade. However, when your comments on a first draft go back to a student
who knows she will be writing a second version, those comments stand the best chance
of being applied. As for limiting your suggestions, both you and the student will
benefit if you make your task, and subsequently the student's, more manageable.
Aspects of a student's work you might consider when responding to it
- assignment (degree of completion);
- form (appropriateness for assignment);
- focus (the paper's main idea, thesis, guiding question);
- organization (order of paragraphs, central idea of each paragraph);
- evidence (data, examples, quotations, illustrations, personal experience);
- language (appropriate to the topic, assignment, discipline);
- discussion (establishing connections between focus, evidence, and writer's own ideas);
- gaps (missing evidence, discussion, connection);
- sources (selection of relevant ones, presentation in formal style);
- the writer's personal voice; and
- other aspects relevant to your discipline.
For more discussion about commenting on student drafts and resources on using writing
in your teaching visit Simmons University's website
Questions?
Brighton Campus
Building 5, Room 544
(585) 292-3386